(4)

Balancing economic development and conservation

Steve Pearce

I will continue to fight for reasonable solutions that protect the environment, protect species and protect workers, but do not hamstring our economy

Like all Americans, I want to protect wildlife in both good and bad times. Gifford Pinchot, the first Chief of the U.S. Forest Service once said, “Conservation means the wise use of the earth and its resources for the lasting good of men.” I concur wholeheartedly.

Mr. Pinchot was one of the most publicly known conservationists of the 20th Century, and recognized that to have healthy forests, controlled thinning operations must take place. He believed as I do that conservation should never mean tying our hands to economic development or good stewardship of our lands, but instead should be about finding a balance between jobs and resource protection.

I have always advocated balance, which is why I support the cooperative efforts between private stakeholders, federal officials and local governments through the Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA), which allows private landholders to enroll their land and money in a program designed to protect the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard without listing it. This is a reasonable approach that will serve New Mexico well by protecting our environment and our economy simultaneously.

Of course, common sense is usually in short order when it comes to D.C. lawyers and lobbyists with their hands on taxpayer dollars.

As Congress moves forward in the appropriations process, various special interests often state that while they understand that we are in tough times, their specific program is just too important to face any sort of belt tightening.

Science

My efforts to cultivate cooperation and commonsense conservation of the lizard are based on sound science. Earlier this year, a study conducted by the Range Improvement Task Force at New Mexico State determined that much of the data used as evidence for a listing of the lizard is “not scientifically defensible.”


Advertisement

Another study by Texas Tech University stated that uncertainties related to the effects of oil and gas exploration on the lizard’s population “preclude an accurate assessment of risks, and therefore prevent management decisions that could optimize both species protection and economic production.” I take the word of scientists at world-class research universities over D.C.-based special interest groups.

Even our two distinguished senators, with whom I frequently disagree on issues like this, submitted a letter to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requesting more time for scientific data to be gathered. Last week, Dan Ashe, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announced that he is delaying a decision on the listing because the growing body of scientific evidence questions the necessity of a listing.

One of the major problems with the current system is that its success rate is quite low. Only about 1 percent of all species ever listed have reached their recovery goals. That is simply unacceptable. Even when species reach their recovery goals, many times environmental groups will sue to keep them listed, costing taxpayers millions in continuing unnecessary programs and legal costs. The best way to improve and modernize the current system is to bring all parties to the table to work on voluntary, science-based solutions that do not put jobs at risk.

Voluntary conservation

Washington has ignored the considerable conservation efforts already taking place in New Mexico that strike a balance between economic growth and species protection. As of last week, some $2.5 million in private funds and 2.3 million acres of land have been enrolled in the CCAA designed to protect the lizard and the Lesser Prairie Chicken. This partnership includes oil and gas leases, ranches, state authorities and the federal government.

The Endangered Species Act states very plainly that, “the Secretary shall cooperate to the maximum extent practicable with the States.”  This is exactly what is happening in New Mexico with the CCAA.

In August of this year, Mr. Ashe said, “Ensuring the survival of imperiled species depends on long-term partnerships and landowner participation.” The Bureau of Land Management’s New Mexico office and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resource Conservation Service submitted public comments opposing the listing because current, good faith conservation efforts are working.

I am not willing to stand idly by while Washington lawyers and lobbyists pursue a rush to judgment that will destroy thousands of jobs and undermine the cooperative efforts that are working so well. And I am glad to see others in the federal government taking a stand, and giving more control to state and local wildlife agencies for proper stewardship.

Taxpayer-subsidized lawsuits

The reality is that special interests are getting an actual subsidy – to settle out of court after suing federal agencies into submission. These settlements for legal fees often come at the rate $350-$650 an hour. This subsidy kills jobs, and keeps real scientists and public-policy specialists from finding the right solutions to our problems. This sort of lawyer welfare is not sound economic policy, and will not pay back a dime of our $15 trillion in debt.

To make matters worse, federal agencies do not even keep track of how much money they pay out to these shady special-interest groups, but the only available research shows that it is somewhere in the millions of dollars annually. We deserve better.

Our country is in the midst of a fiscal and economic crisis we have not seen in over 70 years. I will continue to fight for reasonable solutions that protect the environment, protect species and protect workers, but do not hamstring our economy. There is no recovery for an extinct species, so we must find the right solutions, and incorporate local stakeholders into conservation management. We know what works and what does not, and no matter how many special interests attack me, I will not stop doing what is right for New Mexico.

Pearce, a Republican, represents New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District in the U.S. House.

Tagged as: , ,

4 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.

  1. The ignorance in Mr. Pearce’s letter is amazing. I recommend he join the Republicans for Environmental Protection. He just might learn something about true conservation.
     
    http://www.rep.org/

  2. Mr. Pearce’s was named one of  the “Dirty Dozen”in 2010 by the League of Conservation Voting for his negative record on clean energy and environmental protection. In fact, during Mr. Pearce’s time in office, of 17 House votes on pro-environment legislation, he voted “Nay” 16 times and abstained once.  According to LCV, “The House of Representatives averaged more than one anti-environmental vote for every day the House was in session in 2011, according to the report. More than one in five of the legislative roll call votes taken in 2011 – 22% – were votes to undermine environmental protections.”  I think we know what side Mr. Pearce is on – the one with money. http://www.lcv.org/media/blog/the-most-anti-environment.html
     

  3. I read Congressman Stevan Pearce’s disgusting letter regarding conservation. Our Congressman  has demonstrated repeatedly his adherence to special interests especially in the oil and gas industry. During his terms as a Congressman he has enriched himself with a lucrative sale of his oilfield services company assets at a great price to Key Energy and has a stock portfolio that continues to make money while the average person (like me) loses value in theirs. He also has full Congressional retirement and healthcare benefits.

    In addition he hired as his chief of staff Mr. Todd Willens, a Washington insider and big-time lobbyist, who is well-known for his anti-wilderness views and his opposition to the Endangered Species Act.  It is  Mr. Willens who  probably wrote Mr. Pearce’s distasteful  letter on conservation. Don’t forget that in 2008 Congressman Pearce introduced a hare-brained bill that would have eliminated all wilderness study areas in Doña Ana County and require the sale of tens of thousands of acres of federal land.

    Teddy Roosevelt saw the dangers to the American republic by these lobbyists and  “malefactors of great wealth.” He went on to say: “. . . [these men] combine to bring about as much financial stress as possible, in order to discredit the policy of the government and thereby secure a reversal of that policy, so that they may enjoy unmolested the fruits of their own evil-doing. . . I regard this contest as one to determine who shall rule this free country—the people through their governmental agents, or a few ruthless and domineering men whose wealth makes them peculiarly formidable because they hide behind the breastworks of corporate organization.”

    It appears the lobbyists rule in the GOP especially with Mr. Pearce. Something stinks in Southern New Mexico! New Mexicans – please hold your noses!

  4. “Gifford Pinchot, the first Chief of the U.S. Forest Service once said, “Conservation means the wise use of the earth and its resources for the lasting good of men.” I concur wholeheartedly.”
     
    Well, I don’t agree with that statement, nor should anyone who truely loves and reveres God.  Wise use of the earth should benefit ALL of God’s creatures. 
     
    You claim that efforts so far have not been very sucessful with endangered species– well, that may be partly due to our ignorance as to the best way to enhance their chances of survival, and also to sabotage (like the wolf killers in Catron county). 
     
    I applaud the efforts of private parties to protect God’s creatures– people like Kent Clegg of Idaho, who in 1997 tried to help restore the whooping crane population, helping them to find their way to the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge near Socorro New Mexico, but they all (four of them) died after a few years.  There was an article in High Country News by Janis Marston in November 2002 titled  “Farewell, whoopers, Western skies aren’t big enough for you.”  Where were you, Mr. Pearce, when this was going on?  Holding town hall meetings about how to help the whooping crane?  Right.  Whooping cranes don’t vote.
     

     
     

Leave a response

You must be logged in to post a comment.