Help wanted: One good man or woman for America
It might seem that America’s top job has been a bit top-heavy with lawyers and military men. Maybe we ought to re-write the qualifications for the presidency, especially in light of the precarious financial and geopolitical situation in which we find ourselves today. Here are my suggested qualifications.
We’ve had 26 lawyers, 12 generals, four small businessmen and one haberdasher who have served as president of these United States. Most were college graduates. One was unmarried. Twelve of them owned slaves during their lives and eight had slaves while they were president. Four presidents were killed while in office. Two were impeached.
Judging by the numbers, it might seem to the casual observer that America’s top job has been a bit top-heavy with lawyers and military men. That said, maybe we ought to re-write the qualifications for the job, especially in light of the precarious financial and geopolitical situation in which we find ourselves today. I offer this sample up for your consideration:
“Wanted: One top manager with extensive experience in small-to-large business(es), preferably in a senior leadership position with direct responsibility for the motivation of employees of diverse backgrounds and skill-sets. He/she must have a proven track record of diplomacy and time-tested communication skills and be multilingual. Individual must have lived and/or worked overseas, been responsible for budgets of upwards of $100 million and be able to manage approx. 2.6 million federal workers (85 percent of whom live outside the nation’s capital).
“The ideal candidate must be in excellent physical and mental health. He/she must have a clear vision for America and have an identifiable ideology, be able to articulate it and be able to compromise both for the good of the country. In addition, he/she must have been unsuccessful at realizing some of his/her goals during his/her formative years and have learned from his/her mistakes and applied that knowledge to new tasks. Subject must possess a good sense of humor, a winning smile, be affable, suffer fools gladly, and be willing to make friends for America without apologizing for its values.
A thorough understanding of economics, world geography, history, political science and psychology are crucial, as is a deeply rooted appreciation for America’s core values, its religious beliefs and its Constitution and Bill of Rights. As a consequence of the job, applicant must be willing to undertake extensive domestic and foreign travel. He/she must have been or be married to a person of the opposite sex and have been faithful to his/her spouse (children are optional, but will be scored as a plus given the value of the parenting experience).
Prior service in the military is highly desirable, as is knowledge of the country’s Status of Forces Agreements, strategic basing objectives and international agreements with organizations like the U.N. and NATO, for example. Successful applicant must be willing to secure America’s borders to stem the flow of illegal immigrants, but also be willing to engage the country in an open and honest dialogue about reforming the country’s immigration policy. He/she is not required to be able to play golf, basketball, touch football, soccer, badminton or other sports, but must be willing to ceremoniously open the season for each of them if asked (travel to/from the site will be reimbursed, but not for ordinary attendance at such events).
Knowledge of the country’s energy demands and resources along with new renewable energy technologies will be helpful. He/she must be able to stand for long periods of time, occasionally with hand over heart, and be able to recite the Pledge of Allegiance and know the words to the national anthem. Subject must know what the national motto is and be able to name the capitals of all U.S. States (and know how many there are). The successful applicant must have strong spiritual and/or religious convictions as they are endemic to the nation’s well-being (atheists need not apply).
“Finally, subject must know the difference between right and wrong and have a steadfast belief in the inherent goodness of his/her fellow man, while recognizing that evil is not a concept but a reality to be reckoned with. Applicants should include a list of references along with a 1,500 word essay on ‘What America Means to Me.’ A final decision on the candidate will be made on Tuesday, November 6, 2012.”
Stephan Helgesen is a retired foreign-service officer who lived and worked in 24 countries. He was a small-business owner on three separate occasions. He is now the honorary consul for Germany in New Mexico and owner of Second Opinion Marketing, an Albuquerque export consultancy. He can be reached at helgesen@2ndopinionmarketing.com.
|
Share
Tweet
|
Advertisements
|
4 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.
Leave a response
You must be logged in to post a comment.





Contact


Subscribe













Good piece Stephan. I hope you and the commenters that share your opinion take a look at Americans Elect and decide to participate.
If you want to change the way we select candidates, you have to start somewhere.
Well, if we want to get someone with these qualifications, we need to raise the salary to something like five million dollars per year and give that person the full authority that a real manager in the private sector has. Singapore, for example, has a population of around 5.2 million and covers an area of about 250 square miles. Their president’s salary is about $3,355,000 per year. So we pay our president peanuts in comparison–what other compensation makes up for this discrepancy? At present, I think one has to be very idealistic, greedy for power, or very stupid, to want to be president of the USA.
Here is a quick comparison of the health of individuals in the USA, Norway (which has a similar cost of living to the USA, I think) and Singapore. Download the (rather abstruse) tables from a recent report from the WHO,
see http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/2011/en/index.html .
According to these tables, in 2008 the cost of healthcare, with the USA cost set at 1.0 per capita, is 1.2 for Norway and only 0.2 for Singapore. Probability of dying between the ages of 15 and 60, however, with the USA again set to 1.0 (actual # 106 per thousand) is 0.63 for Norway and 0.56 for Singapore.
Any good manager would make improving our cost efficiency in health care, and other areas, a priority, but in our country common sense is drowned by the floods of money that special interest groups throw at the political system. Maybe we need to adopt Singapore’s constitution, or at least study it to see how we can improve ours?
Atheists need not apply????
How about a theoretical debate on the type of person who should be president, rather than all this arguing about Obama versus the GOP candidate of the day? I posted this commentary in the top slot on the NMPolitics.net homepage today to encourage people to step back from the 2012 election and discuss the type of person we want to be president.