(6)

Guv candidates talk about university regents

Susana Martinez (left, courtesy photo) and Diane Denish (photo by Heath Haussamen)

Both candidates for governor say they would pick university regents based on qualifications and experience rather than politics, but neither is explicitly promising that she won’t try to exert direct control over regents by attempting to remove those who don’t vote her way on issues.

And neither gubernatorial candidate is endorsing Gov. Bill Richardson’s proposal to create a screening panel to recommend regent candidates to the governor.

The context: Richardson, early in his tenure, tried unsuccessfully to remove the New Mexico State University student regent after she disregarded his wishes on three key votes. He had required signed but undated resignation letters from his appointees, and he tried to use the student regent’s to force her off the board. The regent publicly stood up to Richardson and he backed down.

And now, Richardson is proposing the creation of screening committees at state universities to recommend candidates to the governor. The governor would still make the final decision.

With that in mind, here’s what I asked the gubernatorial candidates:

  • What qualities would you look for in people you’re considering appointing to university boards of regents?
  • Do you support the current governor’s proposal to create a committee to screen and recommend candidates for possible appointment to regents positions at the state’s universities?
  • Also, the current governor tried to micromanage the state’s universities by attempting to remove regents who didn’t vote his way on individual policy issues. Would you attempt to exert direct control over universities in a similar way or allow regents the freedom to vote based on what they think is right?

Republican Susana Martinez didn’t answer the second question, and neither she nor Democrat Diane Denish directly responded to the third, though Martinez did say regents should “be focused on doing what’s right” and Denish said she wanted to ensure that “the academic missions of our universities are uncompromised by the political process.”

Here are the responses they did provide:


Advertisement

Susana Martinez

“As with any appointed position, I would ask my appointees to come to the administration free of personal agendas and ready to serve the people of New Mexico. The Richardson/Denish Administration has too often used the appointment process to reward big donors and political allies. We must ensure that we are appointing ethical and experienced people and that we are electing leaders whose purpose is serving the public.

“I will end the practice of handing out exempt positions as political favors, a practice that has been so prevalent under the Richardson/Denish Administration. Regents should be focused on doing what’s right for the institution and its students and faculty and have the experience and qualifications necessary to be effective. With the right regents in place, we will ensure that higher education thrives in New Mexico, and remains free of undue political influence.”

Diane Denish

“As governor, I will work to ensure that the academic missions of our universities are uncompromised by the political process.

“My philosophy with any appointments is to pick the most qualified, not the most connected. I would want any regent I appoint to have strong knowledge of the university and a connection to it. I would also want regents who are focused on the academic missions of the school. I believe the key to New Mexico’s future economic success is intimately tied to innovative academic programming and producing graduates who are prepared to lead New Mexico in the 21st century economy.

“Having served as a regent at New Mexico Tech, I understand that the role of regents should be focused on broad policy-making and not micro-managing the day-to-day operations of a university.

“There are several ideas about creating screening processes for regents. Though I welcome suggestions on potential regents from stakeholders at the universities, the ultimate appointment decision lies with the governor and it is a responsibility I take very seriously.

“The current governor’s proposal does not have any bearing on how a future governor will proceed with the selection of regents. As outlined, my guiding principles when selecting a regent would be qualifications and commitment to the institution’s academic mission.”

Tagged as: , , , ,
Share








Advertisements

6 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.

  1. The proposal to revise the means of selecting the regents is coming from the faculty at NM’s universities, not from Richardson directly. Both UNM and NMSU are in turmoil, due both to the consequences of the recession to the consequences of the actions of Regents who know next to nothing about academia. Under both Republican and Democratic governors, the appointments to the governing body of these major institutions are treated as political plums not requiring any other qualifications than having an undergraduate degree from the school. Faculty are getting sick and tired of having people who are at best well meaning amateurs making major policy decisions. Both schools are losing high quality faculty and administrators. The reluctance of the candidates to support reforming the regent selection process shows their disregard for these institutions that are so crucial to the economic development of the state.

  2. PenPal you are sadly mistaken about Martinez. She has been the most open and transparent candidate of the two. If you believe Denish is the candidate of choice, I would suggest you vote for her and get what you deserve, which will be the same old same old as before.
    Since you obviously voted for Obama and Bill Richardson, how full is your pocketbook now? Is it all working out for you? At least they passed on the higher cost of government through your taxes. Maybe you could loan me some of that money to pay for the loss in my Social Security and the mess Obama has made of my Medicare.

  3. From this, I assume that we won’t see political cronies, large donors, and active campaign supporters in the administration or popping up on boards and commissions. That would be a nice change. But … what ARE the characterisiics of a good university regent?

  4. How about appointing regeants who respect and get along with the current teaching staff?

  5. One telling difference between these two responses: Martinez never uses the word “academic” or any of its cognates; Denish does.

    Another telling difference: Martinez devotes half of her response to talking about the current administration and its practices (as she views them) and half to the questions; Denish says nothing about her opponent and everything about the issue.

    Martinez is making herself a “stealth candidate” who has a skimpy platform mostly of opposition to the previous administration; the tactic is a smokescreen which enables her to hide positions which she knows many New Mexicans, if clearly informed about them, would reject and Martinez with them.

  6. This sounds good from both candidates. The positions have too often been used in a political way. But so far NM is far better at this than Texas for instance. There the regents and even some of the university presidents are just political hacks and cronies of the Guv. I am sure neither of the candidates we have would use the positions as egregiously as Texas has.

Leave a response

You must be logged in to post a comment.