Does size matter?

Brown Pelicans captured at Grand Isle, La. on Thursday wait to be cleaned of Gulf spill crude oil. (Photo courtesy of the International Bird Rescue Research Center)
The question of whether government is too big or small is irrelevant. The question is whether government does its job.
Like most Americans, I’ve been captivated by the oil spewing out of the Earth and into the Gulf of Mexico. The cost of this disaster – in human health and life, to Louisiana’s economy, and to the local and global ecosystems – remains unknown. The one thing all experts agree on is that it’s going to be big and bad for everyone.
The spill happens in the context of TEA party rallies, a fragile economic recovery, an expanding national debt, border security concerns, midterm elections, an expanded health care system and two wars – all of which have highlighted two distinct and competing visions of the role of business and federal government in the United States. One side argues that government engagement with the private sector should be severely limited. The other side argues that only through government partnerships can we ensure that there is a safe and fair playing field.
I’ve consistently associated myself with the latter vision – and still do. There are services that governmental agencies, in cooperation with the private sector, can provide that individuals cannot. I can’t build all the roads I take to work or the grocery store or the park. I can’t build and sustain fire stations or hospitals all by myself. I can’t inspect all the meat and produce that ends up on my dinner table. I can’t regulate the oil companies to ensure that the oil and gas that I use in my car is produced safely and with minimum externalized costs.
This oil spill has shown the flaws within both worldviews; neither government nor industry has effectively protected its citizens or its customers. This was true of the financial crisis, and it’s true now of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
Who is best positioned?
So, where does that leave us now? Just because government and industry have both failed us in these two situations doesn’t mean that it must always be so. If we are being fair, we can also point to many successes on the part of both institutions. But the question remains: Who is best positioned to make sure that every precaution is taken to avoid these disasters?
Consider this:
• Government is not for profit. As it should, industry streamlines its processes constantly to decrease cost and increase revenue. This drive for constantly improved efficiency can lead to risk-taking (in other contexts we call this being entrepreneurial). Government, on the other hand, is charged with protecting the life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness of its citizens. Simply put, government’s mission more closely aligns with the job that needs doing.
• Public accountability. By definition, our government is accountable to its constituents. We have the opportunity (even if few choose to take advantage of it) to change our elected leaders based on our opinion of their performance. In the private sector, the public has little recourse.
• Redundancy. Many folks bemoan the redundancies they perceive in government, but this is one of the attributes that recommends it as a regulatory body. For example, I am on a Doña Ana search and rescue team, which often is called upon to extract an injured person from a mountainside. To ensure safety, every knot is double-checked by two or more people to make sure that it’s done correctly. Is this fast? No. Is it safe? Yes.
An irrelevant question
To me, it is clear that government is a far better ally in protecting public interests. The question of whether government is too big or too small is irrelevant. The question is whether it does its job. In too many cases it hasn’t done its job. That needs to change because it’s the institution that can best provide the essential services, infrastructure and oversight that allow us to live well.
We face complicated problems as a city, state, nation and world. I hope this blog can serve as a forum for reasonable discussion of our options.
See you next time.
Nick Voges is the blogger behind NMPolitics.net’s Zeitgeist. E-mail him at nick@nmpolitics.net.
|
Share
Tweet
|
Advertisements
|
3 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.
Leave a response
You must be logged in to post a comment.





Contact


Subscribe











I don’t think the size of government is irrelevant, particularly when it is not doing a good job at most everything it does. It’s effectiveness vs. size (read $$$ costs) is a very relevant question. When a Prez’s daughters (young and inexperienced as they are) ask him “have you stopped the oil leak yet Daddy?”, I have to worry about what people actually think government can do about something as technologically complex and demanding as deep water drilling and production. The government has no business being in the business of deep water oil and gas technology and operations; we just can’t afford that kind of redundancy. The government cannot be experienced and knowledgeable about everything in our society, just in case something bad happens somewhere, sometime. There is a concept known as “6 Sigma”, or the level of training, confidence, preparation, and processes necessary to reduce “flaws” or “errors” in any system to a 6 sigma (six standard deviations from norm) level of occurrence, or a .00034% chance of occurring. It is the most sought-after level of competence in industries everywhere. There are some industries that are in that level of perfection, airlines for instance, but planes still crash and people still die frequently.
The point is that the government can never make any human endeavor error or accident free; it can’t be done with all the tax money (our money) in the world. So the question is how much are we as a nation willing to spend to try and improve things through a corrupt, wasteful, and unresponsive government bureaucracy? That is a very relevant question, as costs determine size and scope of government and its’ wrt private industry. I have very little faith or trust in government as I have seen it operate and know the expertise of the people running things. Unless that changes, I would demand a thorough and complete cost/benefit analysis done by independent third parties before I would allow them to grow or spend any money to duplicate or triplicate industry efforts to prevent things like this oil spill.
Thought provoking! I feel a strong partisan undertone in almost everything I read lately. How refreshing that this post pushed all of the typical divisiveness aside to reminded us that we’re all in this together. Now, if only we could start acting like it. Thanks for the new blog, Heath!
Great posting! It’s nice to have a little thoughtfulness at work when thinking about government and its services….