I will restore accountability and trust to the State Land Office
This is in response to a guest column submitted by current Land Commissioner Patrick Lyons that you can read by clicking here.
As a candidate for state land commissioner, I bring a record of ethical leadership. I have worked to create thousands of new jobs for New Mexicans. I have a track record of generating more money for our schools and a proven commitment to healing and protecting our state lands.
I’m eager to return to the State Land Office where there’s much to be done!
Oil and gas issues
Of revenues coming to the State Land Office, 95-98 percent are generated from royalties from oil and gas. During much of my tenure, the price of oil was under $15 a barrel. Natural gas was also much lower than in the last eight years.
During Mr. Lyons’ tenure, the price of oil and gas has been much higher. To take credit for this increase in revenue to the State Land Office is disingenuous at best.
Prior to the development of the idea of protecting Otero Mesa as a unique and important landscape, I was the first land commissioner to evaluate the suitability of oil and gas development on specific pieces of state trust land. We evaluated each proposal in the Otero Mesa region and we limited oil and gas leases to only those sites that were appropriate.
I protected thousands of acres of unique and sensitive state trust lands. I commend and support the idea of protecting Otero Mesa as a landscape. It would make a wonderful national preserve.
Protection of state trust lands
I am very proud of my extensive record of protecting and restoring the health of state trust lands. During my tenure we aggressively protected state trust lands. I worked closely with the New Mexico Game and Fish Department, the state Environment Department, the state engineer, the Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department, our lessees, and local communities and county government to protect our trust lands.
I was the first land commissioner to do an asset inventory of trust lands to determine the appropriate future uses of these lands. The inventory included plants, animals, water resources, paleontological finds, archaeological sites, mineral resources, and other features on trust lands.
• I established an internal scientific team and worked with scientists from our universities to review the health of our lands, and make recommendations for restoration.
• I protected habitat for endangered lesser prairie-chicken with federal agencies and grazing lessees.
• I developed a noxious weed management program to protect native plant species.
• In regards to illegal dumping, Mr. Lyons is absolutely incorrect. During my tenure we worked aggressively to clean up illegal dumping and remediate old landfills such as the huge landfill in the Tijeras Arroyo in Albuquerque, which was headed to becoming a super-fund site. We also worked with local communities, like Alamogordo, to develop regional landfills to stop illegal dumping across the region.
Sand and gravel operations
As regards a sand and gravel mining operation in the Bitter Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, I do not know anything about this issue. If this would have happened it would have created a firestorm. Perhaps Mr. Lyons will provide additional information?
Speaking of sand and gravel operations – during my tenure, I had to take to court a sand and gravel operation that was destroying adjoining state land and creating both economic and environmental loss for Velarde, a rural northern NM community.
It is interesting that Mr. Lyons, upon becoming commissioner, reversed the court action and allowed the operator to resume the destruction of the trust land and the community. It is probably coincidental but the operator was a supporter of Mr. Lyons.
Restoration of state trust lands
I am the first land commissioner to seek and get approval from the Legislature to spend money on the restoration of the health of state trust lands. The first year we asked for money to work on 27 projects statewide and reported on our success during the next legislative session.
These projects included stream restoration, protection of historical and archeological sites, clean up of illegal dumpsites and landfills.
Projects initiated during my leadership include:
• Initiated successful river restoration projects at the Santa Fe River, Maudes Creek in Silver City, Pump Canyon near Farmington, Macho Creek near Hatch, Bluewater Creek near Grants, and Alamosa Creek near Truth or Consequences.
• Stabilized the archeological treasures of Old Fort Ruin, the Citadel, Truby’s Tower, Pueblo Blanco, and the Folsum Site.
• Signed agreements with state research universities to share information on the health of plants and animals on state trust land.
• Helped restore the endangered Pecos sunflower with grazing lessees and the N.M. Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department.
Renewable energy
It was my administration that worked with Florida Power and Light and the Public Service Company of New Mexico to locate the first wind turbines in New Mexico. We were term-limited out before construction could commence.
Also, Mr. Lyons has granted numerous purely speculative solar leases for thousands of acres of trust lands so that the speculator, rather than the State Land Office, will make the money if anything ever happens on the land.
When elected, I will establish New Mexico as the leader in the production, in-state utilization, and sale of New Mexico produced renewable energy. I strongly believe that we can become the leader in the development and sale of technologies associated with renewable energy and a restoration economy.
This will provide thousands of good jobs for New Mexicans, significantly increase our tax base, and enhance our support for our public schools, universities and hospitals.
Economic development: principles and projects
During my tenure I built a strong and effective commercial division at the State Land Office. Our objective was to collaborate and cooperate with local communities. I get it: The healthier local communities are the more valuable the adjoining state trust lands become.
I established concrete principles for development on state trust land. These principles were:
• Increase revenues to the beneficiaries.
• Benefit the trust.
• Create jobs.
• Conserve water.
• Preserve unique, accessible, open spaces.
• Recognize the fragile nature of an arid environment.
• Preserve the best farmlands.
• Seek public input.
• Put the trust lands to their highest and best use.
My administration’s economic collaborative achievements included:
• The establishment of the Sandia Science and Technology Park near Sandia National Laboratories. The first tenant was the Emcore Corporation, which produced solar energy components and was headed for New Jersey. We leased trust land to facilitate establishment of the company in New Mexico. This generated more money for our public schools, increased our tax base, and created hundreds of good paying jobs. Mr. Lyons came in and cut the rent in half and thus established a lower value for the adjacent and nearby trust land.
• Community development partnerships in Aztec, Bloomfield and Farmington.
• A joint planning agreement with the community of Rio Rancho. It was the first ever, and it led to Rio Rancho targeting state trust lands for its city center; however, Lyons traded it away, and now the trust gets none of the benefit.
• Job creation in Albuquerque, the Mesa del Sol Planned Development, and the Double Eagle 2 Airport Business District.
• Created a sports complex with Silver City – Altamirano Sports Complex. Also created a 640-acre regional park with Bernalillo County that now has football and soccer fields, plus the Journal Pavilion – all by way of lease, wherein the trust shares in the revenue generated by the amphitheater while it helps pay for the upkeep of the ball fields.
• Traded land with the City of Las Cruces to enable them to lengthen their airport runway and received property in the Las Cruces West Mesa Industrial Park in return.
• Worked with the community of Española to develop a teen center on state trust land.
• Worked with the City and County of Santa Fe to establish affordable housing and develop the San Cristobal Village Community Plan.
• Worked with the community of Edgewood to establish the Edgewood Middle School and the plan for the Edgewood Town Center.
• Worked with the community of Ruidoso to establish a long-term plan for state trust lands within the community — Moon Mountain.
• Worked with the community of Sunland Park to establish affordable housing — Tierra Madre Community.
• Outreach efforts were ongoing to develop more projects in Angel Fire, Clovis, Fort Sumner, Hobbs, Ramah, Rio Rancho, Ruidoso, Truth or Consequences, and Tucumcari when we were term-limited out of office.
Economic development: Mesa del Sol
Then there was the establishment of Mesa del Sol, as the largest infill project in North America.
We created a 1,300 acre employment district and, to avoid urban sprawl, stipulated that jobs come before roof tops. This effort received three major planning awards from the state chapter of the American Planning Association and the project was named a model of planned development by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the President’s Council for Sustainability. We also completed a contract with Cornell University to plan the employment area as the “renewable energy” eco-industrial center for the United States.
All the economic development Mr. Lyons talks about at Mesa del Sol was set in motion by my administration’s work in creating the way that the State Land Office could participate in the upside of development on trust lands. By being creative and entrepreneurial, we attracted the country’s most progressive and environmentally sensitive developer – Forest City.
During my tenure we helped create the Sandia Science and Tech Park. Mr. Lyons devalued the long term leases that we put in place.
Unlike Mr. Lyons, who stopped an open bid process on a major land development project in Las Cruces and then awarded the project to one of his largest contributors, I worked in an open and transparent manner with competitive bids representing the foundation of any proposal.
Regarding the percentage split at Mesa del Sol, my negotiated contract, after a national open and public bid process, called for leasing as much of the state land as possible versus selling it. This would have created a perpetual and significant revenue stream for our public schools.
Mr. Lyons ignored the idea of leasing and either sold or traded all the land he could so the trust only receives a one-time payment for raw land value. Or, as in the case of a 3,000 acre trade Mr. Lyons did, the State Land Office gave up 3,000 acres of land at Mesa del Sol for meager revenue-producing land near Cochiti Pueblo.
Mr. Lyons demonstrates that he doesn’t understand business or the business arrangement my team negotiated between the State Land Office and the Mesa del Sol master developer – after the public bid. The contract my team negotiated ensures that the Land Office receives 100 percent of the original land value plus 100 percent of its natural inflated value. In addition, the State Land Office gets 14 percent of all gross revenues generated by the investment and entrepreneurial efforts of the master developer with no risk to the State Land Office.
Doing business
Mr. Lyons’ deals have corrupted the model we created by rewarding the developers in paying them for 100 percent of all of their expenditures regardless of whether or not those expenditures actually added value to State Trust Land.
I am very proud of my 10-year record of working collaboratively with business to earn more for our public schools, keep our tax payers bills lower, and create good jobs, while protecting the
health of our working lands. I am very proud of ensuring that the trust collected its fair share on behalf of our public schools, universities, and hospitals. Many of the energy audits Mr. Lyons is attempting to take credit for were in the pipeline when we left the Land Office. I certainly give him credit for any that he initiated.
It was not my administration that was taken to court or had attorney general opinions issued to limit my authority because of not acting openly and in compliance with the law: It was Mr. Lyons’ actions that cost New Mexico taxpayers money.
Simply, the Lyons administration has been a disaster. Mr. Lyons has faced numerous legal challenges alleging abuse of his authority.
Early in his term, a non-competitive bid deal on a huge project in Las Cruces resulted in the state attorney general issuing an opinion that Lyons’ non-bidded process was extremely flawed. This project was awarded to one of his largest contributors.
This has been followed by a number of other controversial deals. Recently, Mr. Lyons traded away one of the most beautiful and wildlife-rich areas in New Mexico — White Peak. Again, the state attorney general had to inject himself and take the issue to the New Mexico Supreme Court in an effort to reverse this appalling deal.
In addition, our state auditor has initiated a series of special audits of the land office, legislators have proposed legislation to curb Mr. Lyons’ abuses, and the media has made numerous requests for information, many of which have been re-buffed with the excuse of “executive privilege.”
Endorsements
In conclusion, my record speaks for itself. My record and vision are major reasons that I was endorsed by the Albuquerque Journal, Santa Fe New Mexican, Santa Fe Reporter, the Las Cruces Sun News, teachers, public employees and conservationists.
I am running to restore trust, accountability, transparency and ethics to the important office of state land commissioner – and that is what I will do.
Powell is a former commissioner of public lands and a Democratic candidate for the position this year.
|
Share
Tweet
|
Advertisements
|
10 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.
Leave a response
You must be logged in to post a comment.





Contact


Subscribe













Dr. J:
It wasn’t my intent to sound patronizing, though, in retrospect, I can see how that came across that I was being decidedly… undemocratic in the most literal sense of the word. That is, of course, the great trap of non-verbal communication. While I am aware that I frequently come across as arrogant (possibly because I actually am somewhat), I do at least try not to. For that, you do have my apologies.
It is, of course, obvious what political ideology I tend to align myself with, though I rather resent the implication that I chose it because I’m getting paid to, rather than the reality that I get paid to because I chose it, as I choose whom I support, the same as any other voting citizen. The only real difference is that my choice frequently comes with rather more direct action from me, by necessity. One must pay the bills, after all.
I also thank you for not-so-subtly defining the differentiation between truth and fact. Unfortunately, simply referring to a fact as a “pseudo-fact” just because you don’t like it does not make it any less real.
That Dr. Powell is a fair dealer, a competent public servant, and an honest man is indeed my opinion, and I would daresay my truth. Since truth is, by definition, never objective, saying that you have trouble believing my truths to be objective is a bit of an unnecessary statement from a philosophical point of view..
Facts, on the other hand, are objective. That Dr. Powell has taken a mere single-digit fraction of his donations from the very “special interest” groups that you claim are “bankrolling” his campaign is a fact, and what you seem to be so irritated about is that the fact in question seems to stand in serious opposition to your opinion that he is in these people’s pockets, or at least your assertion that he is in their pockets because they have paid for him to be.
As for my faculties for logical conviction, what exactly makes you think that I’m making any effort to convince you? Very basic cognitive science tells me that doing so would be a waste of my time. Attempting to change preconceived notions, particularly in the ares of politics, religion, or history, often has the effect of instead reinforcing those notions. Unsurprisingly, this effect seems to increase the more conservative those notions are.
However, debates such as this do serve another purpose. While my intention is not to sway you, it is my intention to sway anyone else reading these commentaries (no matter how numerous or sparse though those readers might be). By presenting a more solid bevy of facts (and, to be honest, what I hope is a more convincing personal truth), it is demonstrably possible to sway undecided voters and those wavering generally in my direction… which can make all the difference.
My apologies Icarus, I had no idea I was debating with a “professional political strategist”. That truly intimidates me and makes me fearful to question anything you might say, as I am but a poor, politically ignorant voting citizen who knows only what I read and experience for myself. You obviously know the “truth” (as your pre-conceived notions direct you to see it of course) and all things politics, while I alas can only seek to figure these things out for myself using my abilities, logic, and reasoning. However, in reading and listening to your “points” it is obvious which political ideology you are paid to be a strategist for. Thus it is hard to believe your truths as objective, knowing your political biases. And as we all know, politics is all about biases and opinions, not facts or objective truths anyway. Your opinions are fine, but when you want to use those as pseudo-facts to prove an objective point (i.e., Powell is a fair and balanced wrt all constituent groups in NM), your logic fails to convince given your partisan biases and world view.
Dr. J:
Thank you for proving true countless studies about selectivity which state that most people will hear or read only things that already fit with their preconceived notions, particularly about politics. The bulk of my post was in reference to more moderate to conservative groups that support Dr. Powell, and your response was to clumsily restate your prior point.
For the record, Dr. Powell has taken approximately $96,000 in donations. The largest single industry represented in his donor lists? Real estate and development, coming in at approximately $16,000 (after all, this is a land commissioner’s race). Developers can hardly be counted as the most pro-environmental and/or liberal of organizations, but they have a great deal of experience with the fair dealings of a Ray Powell land office, and are hoping that his return will mean that they get to actually bid for contracts again, instead of Commissioner Lyons’ friends getting the contracts sight-unseen.
Attorneys make up for around $7,500, coming in as the second-largest single block of money. The “special interests” you mentioned – unions, educators, environmental groups, etc. – COMBINED make up for $8,400… and that’s only if I count every individual who lists their profession as “teacher” in the mix. If I eliminate them and count them as individual donors (which, strictly speaking, they are, particularly since many of their donations predate the NEA-NM endorsement), that number drops to around $7,700. Split the “special interests” up into their component parts, and the largest is $3,200 from Animal Protection Voters, which, like the approximately $1,000 he’s received from various individual veterinarians, is understandable, seeing as he is one.
If you add all of the above money to various interests not listed above (other politicians, a few businesses, and one web developer who gave $4,000), you get a total of around $35,000, leaving $61,000 from individual donors, rather than some mythical bankroll of liberal special interests.
Tell me, if the “special interests” that you decry are “bankrolling” Dr. Powell’s run, how is it that the ones you mentioned account for barely 8% of his donations, as compared to 64% from individuals and 17% from developers? That’s not a very generous buy, is it? By your standards, it sounds like he’s “in the pocket” of the citizens.
Heaven fore-fend.
Dr. J, I should mention that I’m a professional political strategist, and I keep all the above numbers readily accessible on a spreadsheet. You’re currently playing my game on my court by my rules. I’d strongly recommend against that…
Icarus, are you forgetting about all those endorsements and money from these groups backing Powell? Groups like: Democracy for NM, AFT, NEA, AFSCME, Teamsters, Conservation Voters, Sierra Club. Yes, Powell is in their pockets, and they are all progressive special interests, that is evidence of his bias. Not fair, not transparent, and certainly not for all NM citizens, just his special interests who are bankrolling his run.
Dr J.:
I have looked at the donor lists. I’ve also looked at the donor lists for Sandy Jones (Dr. Powell’s toughest primary opponent), Harry Montoya (who would be my second choice, and who I wish had run for an office he could actually win), Matt Rush (the likely Republican nominee), and Bob Cornelius (who was nice enough to finally comply with the campaign reporting laws, and who seems to think he can bet Rush by sitting spending almost nothing and sitting on over $100,000 of his own money). If you want to make complaints about special interests and are referring to Dr. Powell, then it’s pretty clear what you consider a “special interest” and what you consider legitimate contributions.
Dr. Powell’s contributors include developers (who have experienced and appreciate the transparency and fairness of a Powell land office), ranchers (hardly the most liberal of voters), hunters (the same issue), public employees (who certainly have a good idea of what a fair boss is), educators (who, of course, are working in the system that benefits from the Land Office’s work), animal rights organizations (an admittedly liberal groups of voters, but certainly ones who have legitimate interests in regards to the land office), and ordinary citizens. In fact, the only place he is short in comparison to some of his opponents (particularly Messers. Jones and Rush) is oil and gas interests, who, after the preferential treatment they have received under Commissioner Lyons certainly don’t want a return to the notoriously fair treatment they received under Dr. Powell’s tenure.
What does qualify Dr. Powell for the office is his proven record of fair and transparent administration, leading to a lucrative land office that is demonstrably unbiased. Saying it isn’t without evidence does not make it true.
Icarus, perhaps you should check the donor lists for Powell and for the Jane Goodall Institute, I think my description is quite fair. BTW, I worked with Jane for many years and have nothing against her or her efforts (they are exemplary in her narrow interest areas). But that does not qualify a person to be a high level elected public official looking after all the citizens and all the constituentcies and business interests in New Mexico on a fair, unbiased basis.
Ramirez, let’s set aside the fact that Dr. Powell is widely recognized to have run the single best land office in the country and instead concentrate on your first sentence. What qualifies as a “real job”? A Veterinarian, perhaps? How about working for Dr. Jane Goodall to educate children literally around the world? If you think Dr. Powell needs a “real job”, then either you don’t know anything about him, or you have a perverse definition of what constitutes a real job.
This is a common meme that has surfaced in the last few years, particularly from some of the most conservative politicians. Serving the people in a democratically-elected position isn’t a real job, but running a corporation, no matter how corrupt it may be, is.
As for Dr. J’s commentary, “well-heeled enviro-lobby/trust baby groups and the progressive special interests”? Did you just pull buzz-words from a hat?
All puffery and rhetoric aside, Mr. Powell is in the pockets of the well-heeled enviro-lobby/trust baby groups and the progressive special interests. He is too one-sided and partisan in his background and approach to be a fair and objective lands commish. We need someone with a more balanced and fair view of all sides, Mr. Powell isn’t it.
How can restore trust and accountibility to the land office when you lie about selling land?
I read in the Albuquerque Journal that Powell got caught lying about repeatedly saying he “never sold an inch of land” during his tenure, then documents produced through the land office proved other wise. He sold land to Washington insiders and told the Journal he somehow didn’t remember that happening until he saw the land sales he signed back in 1999.
What else has he lied about?
Man, go find a real job. You had your chance. We seriously need permanent term limits that allow for two terms total! All we need is Richardson to come back to haunt us in 2014.