Cleaning up the environment and growing the economy
April 22 marks the 40th anniversary of Earth Day. We can thank people like Sen. Gaylord Nelson, the founder of Earth Day, for creating a fledgling environmental movement that allowed crucial environmental legislation to be adopted and implemented.
Since then, we have benefited from federal and state laws that make our air cleaner and our water safer. Those laws protect our children, keep people healthy, save lives and provide for sustainable development.
It is important to note that while we were busy cleaning up the environment, our nation’s economy grew. At the same time, we made significant progress in improving the quality of our environment, and the gross domestic product of our country grew more than 126 percent. That growth, of course, was contrary to the predictions of many of the industries subject to environmental laws.
Thirty years ago, when the federal government required the auto industry to reduce toxic air pollutants, industry and the federal Chamber of Commerce claimed that the auto industry would collapse. Instead, it grew and more cars were put on the road than ever before.
Global warming
While we should take pride in the environmental work we have accomplished, this is no time to rest on our laurels. We are now faced with one of the biggest issues yet to be tackled. There is overwhelming scientific evidence that widespread climate change will affect the health and welfare of every New Mexican.
Global warming pollution is causing hotter global temperatures, more extreme weather such as droughts and floods, increased forest fires, negative health effects, and other serious impacts. The costs of failing to address the impacts of climate change are staggeringly high. A recent study by the Climate Leadership Initiative showed that the cost to New Mexico citizens of higher temperatures, reduced snow pack, forest fires, droughts, energy costs and health care costs will average $3,430 annually per family by 2020.
Is this the kind of legacy we want to leave our children? It would be irresponsible for us to ignore climate change and pass these problems onto the next generation.
As one of the leading states in the nation on climate change, I am proud of the work we have accomplished to reduce greenhouse gases and promote clean energy jobs in New Mexico. Jobs are growing rapidly in the clean energy sector and we need to continue policies to nurture this young but growing industry.
New Mexico now produces much more electricity from renewable energy sources and has many more clean energy manufacturing and installation jobs than when Gov. Richardson took office seven years ago.
Water quality
We should also be proud of our accomplishments in the protection of water quality. New Mexico has been on the forefront of preserving the critically important protections that have been afforded by state and federal laws. Several decades ago, the nation’s waters were in jeopardy. With the passage of the federal Clean Water Act and the state Water Quality Act, we’ve restored and protected the water supply that is the lifeblood of our state and the nation.
In New Mexico, an arid state, we cannot afford to pollute even the smallest amount of our precious water supply. Clean water is a basic right, and must be protected now and in the future.
As we reflect on the history of Earth Day, we must make a commitment to ourselves and future generations that we will continue to meet the most important environmental challenges we face. On Earth Day, we must celebrate our past successes in caring for the planet.
After that, we must continue to work together for the good of the environment and the economy.
Curry is the cabinet secretary for the New Mexico Environment Department.
|
Share
Tweet
|
Advertisements
|
3 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.
Leave a response
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Contact


Subscribe











For those of us who prefer drinking water that is not contaminated, and for those of us who want to ensure that our children are not saddled with pollution-induced asthma for their entire life, and for those who want to reduce volatility of our general fund by diversifying our dependence on oil while creating high-wage jobs in NM to compete in the 21st century economy, I say BRAVO SECRETARY CURRY!!
Curry has used his bully pulpet as department secretary to further political agendas vice an agenda that is beneficial to the people of the State. That said – there are many good things the department has done, but he has personally used the tools available to him as weapons for political payback and reward – both good and bad. That said – he is not a good steward of the department and its mission. Several bureaus and divisions are mismanaged and he has exercised beneign neglect. The Drinking Water Bureau is a disaster – his creation of the Water & Wastewater Infrastructure Division is an abject failure, their stewardship of resources and manpower is a case study of how to not run a government or business entity and good, capable, smart employees have been driven away. EPA Region 6 has cited New Mexico as the worst state in its area of influence and have threatened to remove state primacy over environmental programs. The latest fiasco is the misguided effort to saddle New Mexico as the only state putting a silver bullet in its heart with green house gas rules and regulations – circumventing legislative oversight and imposinng HUGE liabilities and costs on the State and it’s population. His departure as secretary can NOT come to soon.
Mr. Curry, wrt AGW (anthropogenic global warming) I do hope you were able to listen to and read the testimony and comments to EIB concerning the NEE petition. If you did perhaps you may have learned some important scientific facts that refute your hypothesis that man’s CO2 is the primary cause of the minor, short term climate changes over the last few decades. I also hope you have read and understood much of the comments and testimony given to EIB and the NMED wrt greenhouse gas cap and trade proposals that show the fallacies of this scheme and the negative and drastic economic consequences visited on places like California, including renewable energy mandates and the extreme increases in the cost of electricity in L.A. NM cannot take a huge economic hit, as Lt. Govenor Denish stated in her Op/Ed, by blindly and naively following scientifically unfounded CO2 hysteria. The environment is important and must be protected, but the focus has to be on scientifically proven data and facts, and the effects on the economy and jobs cannot be ignored.