(3)

Hatch Act complaint filed against judicial candidate

Rick Wellborn

A Las Cruces resident has filed a federal Hatch Act complaint alleging that Republican Rick Wellborn’s candidacy for district judge violates the ban on partisan political activity by public employees whose jobs involve federal funds.

Wellborn is a prosecutor in the 3rd Judicial District Attorney’s Office. He and his boss, Doña Ana County District Attorney Susana Martinez, say though the office receives federal funds, Wellborn’s job isn’t funded with those dollars and none of his duties have anything to do with the federal grants.

Federal law prohibits federal employees, and other government employees whose jobs involve federal funds, from running in partisan political races.

Las Crucen Ernie Bean wrote in his complaint that the district attorney’s office receives federal funding through several programs and includes southwest border funds, crime victim funds and funds to combat drug trafficking.

“I am not aware of any mechanism by which the district attorney is able to fully segregate Mr. Wellborn’s salary and other office resources from federal grant money,” Bean wrote in his complaint. “As such, Mr. Wellborn is violating the Hatch Act by running for partisan office.”

Martinez said the funds are separated. Each source of funding that comes into the office – such as state general fund money and the various federal grants – is assigned its own accounting code. The state’s SHARE system, which handles accounting, employment, payroll and purchasing information for Martinez’s office, keeps track of how each position is funded.

Martinez said Wellborn’s job is paid “absolutely 100 percent” by state general fund money.

Bean pointed to previous Hatch Act opinions that state that “Employees are subject to the Act if, as a normal and foreseeable incident of their principal employment, they perform duties in connection with the federally financed activities.” The opinions state that coverage “is not dependent on the source of an employee’s salary, nor is it dependent upon whether the employee actually administers the funds or has policy duties with respect to them.”

Martinez said none of Wellborn’s duties involve federal funds either – because, in her office, duties are based on where the funding for an employee’s job comes from.

It’s not clear when the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, which oversees compliance with the Hatch Act, will respond to Bean’s complaint.

Tagged as: , ,
Share








Advertisements

3 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.

  1. Humm … I’ve seen occassional reference to this in the Sun News online commentary, but this raises the visibility and credibility of those comments. How much federal money DOES the DA office get, how is it spent, and how does it affect the status of the DA?

  2. Heath, I am disappointed to see a regurgitation of the poorly researched article from the Sun News about the Hatch Act rewritten given credibility in this blog. It doesn’t take much time to research the things covered by the Hatch Act and once that is determined, it is easy to see this is a bogus complaint set up by someone as an early campaign smear on an honorable man who is willing to do public service. Please, don’t lower your standards of ‘research before writing’ that I have come to depend on. You have developed some respect for your investigations….please don’t treat that with contempt.

  3. In the Annual report of the District Attorney there is the following statement about a federal grant:” The receipt of a significant grant award from the Southwest Border Prosecution Initiative. This has enabled the District Attorney’s office to purchase up-to-date technology equipment and furniture not only for itself, but also for all surrounding law enforcement agencies that bring in criminal cases to the Office of the District Attorney.” So Mr. Wellborn never received any equipment or furniture from this federal grant? It was all coded!

    Interestingly the auditors Marcus, Fairall, Bristol + Co., LLP found:…”we identified certain deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be significant deficiencies.”

    This might be relevant.

Leave a response

You must be logged in to post a comment.