<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate might expand webcasting too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/2010/02/senate-might-expand-webcasting-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/2010/02/senate-might-expand-webcasting-too/</link>
	<description>Get the real story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ched macquigg</title>
		<link>http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/2010/02/senate-might-expand-webcasting-too/comment-page-1/#comment-9929</link>
		<dc:creator>ched macquigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/?p=12374#comment-9929</guid>
		<description>There is mention of archiving - it is prohibited.

Webcasting without archiving is nearly worthless.  Because committee meetings move around, start and stop times are ignored, and agenda adjustments, it would be impossible to set your VCR or DVR to record anything - you would still be stuck with wading through hours of recordings to find what you wanted.  Without book marks of some kind, viewers would have no idea even of what piece of legislation was on the table.

There are only two real obstacles to archiving - technology and cost.  Neither plays; the technology is there, and so is the money; a few tens of thousands of dollars.

The real reason to not archive is simple, they lack the moral courage to be held honestly accountable for what they do and say in committee meetings and on the floor.

Further, the language that reads; &quot;... cameras configured and operated in such a way that as much of the chamber is displayed as practicable ... ) means more &quot;google earth&quot; coverage where you cannot make who is speaking much less look into their eyes.  The practice of recognizing speakers according to their district, &quot;the chair recognizes the gentleman from timbuctoo&quot; will further confound watchers, unless they are conversant in the names of legislators and the districts they represent.

The sum total of what they have done is a cop out, they&#039;re still cutting us out of the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is mention of archiving &#8211; it is prohibited.</p>
<p>Webcasting without archiving is nearly worthless.  Because committee meetings move around, start and stop times are ignored, and agenda adjustments, it would be impossible to set your VCR or DVR to record anything &#8211; you would still be stuck with wading through hours of recordings to find what you wanted.  Without book marks of some kind, viewers would have no idea even of what piece of legislation was on the table.</p>
<p>There are only two real obstacles to archiving &#8211; technology and cost.  Neither plays; the technology is there, and so is the money; a few tens of thousands of dollars.</p>
<p>The real reason to not archive is simple, they lack the moral courage to be held honestly accountable for what they do and say in committee meetings and on the floor.</p>
<p>Further, the language that reads; &#8220;&#8230; cameras configured and operated in such a way that as much of the chamber is displayed as practicable &#8230; ) means more &#8220;google earth&#8221; coverage where you cannot make who is speaking much less look into their eyes.  The practice of recognizing speakers according to their district, &#8220;the chair recognizes the gentleman from timbuctoo&#8221; will further confound watchers, unless they are conversant in the names of legislators and the districts they represent.</p>
<p>The sum total of what they have done is a cop out, they&#8217;re still cutting us out of the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astute Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/2010/02/senate-might-expand-webcasting-too/comment-page-1/#comment-9925</link>
		<dc:creator>Astute Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/?p=12374#comment-9925</guid>
		<description>For Senator Griego, as the Bruce Willis character in &quot;Die Hard&quot; (not filmed in NM - it was a good movie), said &quot;... welcome to the party, pal ...&quot;  Good.  Any mention of archiving and the ability to search or retrieve after a hard day of work ... for those unable to view during the day, while the meetings are being held?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Senator Griego, as the Bruce Willis character in &#8220;Die Hard&#8221; (not filmed in NM &#8211; it was a good movie), said &#8220;&#8230; welcome to the party, pal &#8230;&#8221;  Good.  Any mention of archiving and the ability to search or retrieve after a hard day of work &#8230; for those unable to view during the day, while the meetings are being held?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

