Comments on: Guv rejects request for info on outgoing appointees http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/2009/12/guv-rejects-reporter%e2%80%99s-request-for-info-on-outgoing-appointees/ Get the real story Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:44:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: jivaro99 http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/2009/12/guv-rejects-reporter%e2%80%99s-request-for-info-on-outgoing-appointees/comment-page-1/#comment-9420 jivaro99 Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:54:16 +0000 http://www.nmpolitics.net/index/?p=10384#comment-9420 To give the names would open the door to where and how some of the money Richardson wasted went. Does anyone think for one moment that he would open that door? It would be like cutting his proverbial throat. As far as the 'not appropriate or dignified', why would it be undignified to release the names of the 59 people. Has it become undignified to lose one's job? If so, then a lot of people have been suffering indignities since the beginning of time. Is the Governor afraid the industry would stop them from getting other jobs, just because these 59 people served in his administration at appointed jobs? That would be like saying the businesses of this state were being prejudiced, which I would not believe for a moment, at least no more prejudiced than the administration has been in hiring. To give the names would open the door to where and how some of the money Richardson wasted went. Does anyone think for one moment that he would open that door? It would be like cutting his proverbial throat. As far as the ‘not appropriate or dignified’, why would it be undignified to release the names of the 59 people. Has it become undignified to lose one’s job? If so, then a lot of people have been suffering indignities since the beginning of time.

Is the Governor afraid the industry would stop them from getting other jobs, just because these 59 people served in his administration at appointed jobs? That would be like saying the businesses of this state were being prejudiced, which I would not believe for a moment, at least no more prejudiced than the administration has been in hiring.

]]>