|
Tweet
| (5) |
Potshots, posturing make budget crisis worse

The Roundhouse in Santa Fe (Photo by Peter St. Cyr)
The last thing we can afford is a repeat of the dynamics on display during the October special session
Between now and the regular session, I hope New Mexico’s political class will dispense with the increasingly boring potshots and posturing and do what’s in the best interest of New Mexicans: Work together to find a solution to our towering state fiscal crisis.
When the state Legislature convenes in January to balance the budget — which some say will mean plugging a $1 billion deficit — we need an environment in which folks roll up their sleeves and work together in a balanced manner. The last thing we can afford is a repeat of the dynamics on display during the October special session.
To start, the governor needs to recognize his own culpability in that fiasco of a special session that delivered him a bill mandating 7.6 percent cuts to executive state agencies, including some Medicaid programs.
Being governor doesn’t mean you are a feudal king with the power to dictate to the state’s lawmaking body exactly how to do their constitutionally mandated job. When you approach them like that, you can expect them to be a little ticked off — and maybe give you legislation not to your liking.
In the same vein, legislators should own up to the fact that they haven’t protected their autonomy sufficiently over the years. This showed during the special session when they refused to exert control over their privileges and consider bills to raise revenue alongside those to cut spending. Not doing so created an untenable situation in which legislators couldn’t take a balanced approach to solving the budget deficit.
And it’s quite hard, if not next to impossible, to support the bill they did pass as a result, given the degree to which it penalizes state workers.
‘Richardson/Denish’ didn’t cause this fiscal crisis

Marjorie Childress
The corrosive political climate is exacerbated by Republican gubernatorial candidates who flood the media with ridiculous claims that “Richardson/Denish” caused the state’s fiscal crisis, as though we aren’t somehow mired in a national economic meltdown that not only began but matured during a Republican administration. The pickle we’re in was caused by an unregulated field day in the banking sector that didn’t just hurt New Mexico, but hurt the entire global economic system.
Given the actual history of the mess we’re in, its very hard to take the Republican broadsides laying the crisis at the feet of “Richardson/Denish” seriously. Especially since Richardson himself should be a Democrat the Republicans love. He passed his own version of the “Bush tax cuts” back in 2003 when he slashed the top personal income tax rates.
And he one-upped the Republicans by not including a sunset clause like the one President Bush included in his tax cuts, which are scheduled to expire in 2011.
If Republican legislators do their work at the regular session in a similar vein as their cohorts running for office, it won’t help along the spirit of cooperation that’s desperately needed among our political leaders.
Raise taxes, make cuts, pull back capital outlay
As painful as the thought may be to Republican legislators and to Richardson, in January we need to seriously consider rolling back those cuts to the state income tax rate on top income earners, and there are other avenues for raising revenue that need to be considered as well. Otherwise we’ll be balancing the budget on the backs of the vast strata of New Mexicans who live at or near poverty, and it won’t be pretty.
In the meantime, Richardson should veto the 7.6 percent budget cuts to executive state agencies. Unfortunately, the wording in the budget bill concerning Medicaid is sloppy, and could lead to deeper cuts than 7.6 percent in executive agencies if the governor chooses to hold Medicaid harmless.
Let’s be clear. If the governor actually cuts Medicaid programs, he’ll damage a lot of the goodwill that exists for him in this state. It’ll go down in history as one of the final things he did while in office, and it won’t be a point of pride.
But going with his interpretation of the bill, not cutting Medicaid will force him to make deeper cuts than 7.6 percent to other programs. Leaders of the state Legislature acknowledged the legitimacy of the governor’s interpretation last Friday when they sent a letter to the governor urging him to not cut Medicaid.
The last thing we can afford are cuts as deep as the budget bill would require if the governor implements it. A guiding principle in the coming months as state leaders grapple with how to balance the budget is that the jobs we still have should be saved.
Like the rest of the country, our unemployment rate has already doubled. In a poor state like ours, government jobs are critical — making up 24 percent of our economy. To further exacerbate our economic stress by cutting jobs will make this recession even longer and even more painful.
The unpopular reality is that legislators are going to have to raise taxes along with budget cuts and the pulling back of capital outlay dollars. It’ll take a lot of collaboration and hard work to get just the right mix so that both jobs and critical services aren’t compromised. A little humility all around would help set the stage for how best to get that done.
Childress writes about politics for the New Mexico Independent, and for m-pyre, a local blog founded in 2004. She also works for the SouthWest Organizing Project. Views expressed in this column are solely her own, and do not reflect the positions or opinions of any organization or person she is affiliated with. You can reach Childress at mrchili9@gmail.com.
|
Share
Tweet
|
Advertisements
|
5 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.
Leave a response
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Contact


Subscribe








I absolutely agree with her point on the Legislature finding itself in this mess by giving so much of their power away. While it was handing power over to the Executive Branch, it voted successively to increase the size of government by a total of 40% since 2001. We now have a bloated state stunted by single-party rule, led by a governor who only cares about leaving.
I think Ms. Childress gives a bit too much credit to Republican legislators in this fight….there aren’t enough Republicans in the Legislature to really impact anything. With nothing close to a majority in either House, the GOP just doesn’t have much impact. This is a battle among Democrats: progressives who want to raise taxes; the Governor, whose agenda beyond himself is unclear; and traditional Democrats, who have in their numbers a few fiscal conservatives.
NM can not be mired in a national economic meltdown. There is nothing to meltdown. When other states go down they just slowely are approching the level of NM.
“as though we aren’t somehow mired in a national economic meltdown that not only began but matured during a Republican administration. The pickle we’re in was caused by an unregulated field day in the banking sector that didn’t just hurt New Mexico, but hurt the entire global economic system”
Seriously? It’s bad enough to hear this from the current presidential administration, but it’s quite another to make the argument in regards to New Mexico’s situation, where the steps leading to this crisis are much more clear and traceable. The problem stems from over-optimistic projections of natural gas and oil prices, and a free-for-all spending spree. As to the fuel prices, lawmakers were warned well in advance of the 2008 session that speculation and not genuine demand had been driving prices. Dr Daniel Fine at New Mexico Tech, an energy economist, had sounded the alarm early and warned that the bottom would eventually fall. He even delivered a speech to that effect at an energy policy conference that April (video can be seen at http://nmcep.nmt.edu). But lawmakers ignored warnings and based the projected budget on inflated prices. Those had nothing to do with the Bush administration, Ms. Childress.
Nor did the out of control spending on pork projects that lawmakers got caught up in. For example, even after declaring a projected budget shortcoming in early summer of 2008, 120 million in ‘budget surplus’ was refunded to New Mexicans–many of whom paid nothing in taxes–in an August special session, just ahead of the November 2008 election. Within a month we suddenly had a hiring freeze of state employees and a 450 million shortfall. Again, Bush had nothing to do with this.
I do agree with the point that responsibility and accountability must be brought into play, but I think that should also be the case for commentators and pundits. I know there seems to be a knee-jerk reaction towards blaming Bush for anything, but the current debacle New Mexico finds itself in is completely owned by Richardson and the Round House.
I don’t know if i agree with Coalcracker but at least somebody is doing some creative thinking. Critical thinking like this will be required to get this state through hard times.
Richardson’s just saying that he doesn’t want to do this and doesn’t want to do that is not telling anybody what he is actually going to do.
A very good and mature essay, given what you have to work with (the pols, not you!). I would like to suggest that New Mexico should hold a constitutional convention and do some rewriting to better distinguish who has what power, etc. I would also think a unicameral legislature would be a good idea. We don’t need a Senate and a House. There will be plenty of checks and balances in a unicameral legislature. We might even consider a full-time legislature with term limits.