var addthis_product = 'wpp-263'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true,"data_track_addressbar":false};if (typeof(addthis_share) == "undefined"){ addthis_share = [];}A bill that would require competitive bidding on all State Land Office development leases was the only legislation in a package of proposals made by three Las Cruces Democrats to gain approval in the session that ended Saturday. Senate Bill 540, sponsored by Steve Fischmann, is now awaiting action by the governor. The bill was [...]" />

(3)

Legislature OKs one land office reform bill

A bill that would require competitive bidding on all State Land Office development leases was the only legislation in a package of proposals made by three Las Cruces Democrats to gain approval in the session that ended Saturday.

Senate Bill 540, sponsored by Steve Fischmann, is now awaiting action by the governor. The bill was a mirror of House Bill 606, sponsored by Jeff Steinborn, who along with Fischmann and Rep. Nate Cote pushed the package of bills in response to a development controversy in Las Cruces.

“Given the problems we’ve had with the State Land Office, and the unchecked opportunity that office has to arbitrarily develop state lands, it was important that we close this loophole,” Steinborn said in a news release about the passage of the Fischmann bill. “This reform will ensure that any developer who acquires state land for development does so through a competitive bidding process, and not through insider connections or big campaign contributions.”

Fischmann said in the release that he was “proud to be a partner in this legislative effort to protect New Mexico’s treasured public resources while also protecting our schools’ financial bottom line. This is great public policy that will make the state millions of additional dollars in future years.”

The transparency and accountability proposals followed Attorney General Gary King’s finding fault last year with Land Commissioner Pat Lyons’ leasing of land on Las Cruces’ East Mesa to Philip Philippou so it could be developed. The AG’s formal opinion on The Vistas at Presidio land deal states that the lease agreement’s method of compensating Philippou’s company for developing the land is “not comprehended by and in conflict with” a statute that allows developers who improve land for the state to be compensated only for the appraised value of the improvements.

In the lease, the land office also agreed to compensate Philippou for other project costs and 40 percent of the change in value of the land as a result of the improvements.

The competitive bidding bill was significant because, in the Las Cruces situation, Lyons bypassed his own bidding process — which he’s not currently required by law to use — and leased the thousands of acres of land in question to Philippou in December 2006. Months earlier, while the Republican Lyons was running for re-election, Philippou gave $20,500 to a political action committee run by lobbyists he employs. The PAC gave most of it to Lyons’ campaign, and the lobbyists gave another $3,600. After Lyons leased the land to Philippou, the developer gave another $6,000 to Lyons.

Share








Advertisements

3 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.

  1. Remember the phrase: Lead, follow, or get out of the way? We elected these guys to lead, and it’s exactly what they are doing.

    Thank you Steve, Jeff and Nate for pushing for the kind of government transparency and accountability that (before the Reagan era) Republicans USED to champion but now have chucked in exchange for their worship of profit at any and all costs.

    And we wonder how we got to Wallstreet 2009?

  2. New Mexicans should be concerned about how Patrick Lyons and his policies have created a shadow over the State Land Office. It is rather funny that Lyons get major political contributions from the same people who get favorable treatment in land deals or rather schemes from him. Governor Richardson better sign the legislation. This is a real reform!

  3. Fischmann and Steinborn got their way. They used State Resources to cast doubt on State Land Commissioner Pat Lyons and his job performance regarding public land use with Philip Philippou in Las Cruces.

    Fischmann and Steinborn as well as others like them are dangerous and threaten the foundation of future development and positive growth.

    Fischmann and his “Progressive Voter Alliance” mission is to stop expansion and annexation in Dona Ana county and force the phony “Green Zone” on people who have enjoyed free access to OUR lands for centuries. His group is a strong minority voice and they are connected to controversial groups outside the State as well as Steinborn’s “Wilderness Alliance” group.

    Mr. Steinborn is now positioning himself to run for State Land Commissioner. If this happens..watch out. The extreme progressive moment will be very difficult to stop…especially with their outside resources from aggressive and dangerous groups.

    New Mexicans should be very concerned about this particular legislation and those who spear-headed it.

Leave a response

You must be logged in to post a comment.