var addthis_product = 'wpp-263'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true,"data_track_addressbar":false};if (typeof(addthis_share) == "undefined"){ addthis_share = [];}Jon. J Mercurio didn’t file enough signatures to qualify to run for mayor of Las Cruces, so his name won’t appear on the ballot for the Nov. 6 election. That leaves District 6 City Councilor Ken Miyagishima as the only challenger to Mayor Bill Mattiace. Mercurio needed 150 signatures of registered voters who live in [...]" />

(8)

Mercurio disqualified from mayor’s race

Jon. J Mercurio didn’t file enough signatures to qualify to run for mayor of Las Cruces, so his name won’t appear on the ballot for the Nov. 6 election.

That leaves District 6 City Councilor Ken Miyagishima as the only challenger to Mayor Bill Mattiace.

Mercurio needed 150 signatures of registered voters who live in Las Cruces to qualify to appear on the ballot, city spokesman Udell Vigil said. He submitted 158 signatures, but only 100 were valid.

“Because he didn’t meet the 150-signature requirement, his name won’t appear on the ballot,” Vigil said.

Mercurio could not be immediately reached for comment.

Vigil didn’t know why 58 signatures Mercurio collected were ruled invalid, but said most often signatures are disqualified because they come from people who live in Las Cruces but aren’t registered in the city to vote. City Clerk Esther Martinez couldn’t be immediately reached for comment.

A representative of Mercurio, who filed his paperwork for him last week, was notified this morning of the disqualification, Vigil said. The clerk plans to announce the official list of candidates later today.

Mercurio, a political newcomer, said in a news release announcing his candidacy that he planned to run on a platform of “fiscal responsibility that stretches across the spectrum from smart growth, participation of the average citizen in their government, open government, infrastructure improvement for the existing community, job creation and quality of life.” He is opposed to public funding for downtown revitalization.

Mercurio’s disqualification most likely benefits Miyagishima. The District 6 councilor has twice run unsuccessfully against Mattiace. Four years ago, Mattiace received 40 percent of the vote to Miyagishima’s 25 percent, and three additional challengers split the other 35 percent. Had the other challengers not been in the race, Miyagishima might have won.

In addition, Miyagishima is running on his most defined platform yet – that the city’s growth is out of control and needs to be slowed – and he’s backed by citizens who have been galvanized by their opposition to the approval in April of the gross receipts tax increase to help fund the spaceport and in May of a massive development on the East Mesa. Some of those citizens were torn about whether to support Miyagishima or Mercurio.

Update, 1:20 p.m.

All other candidates who filed last week qualified to be on the ballot, the city announced today. Here is the official list of candidates:

• Mayor: William “Bill” Mattiace, incumbent, and District 6 Councilor Ken Miyagishima

• City Council District 1: Jose V. Frietze, incumbent, Conrado M. Guerra, Rondeau M. Gurley and Miguel G. Silva

• City Council District 2: Dolores Connor, incumbent, and Vincent Boudreau

• City Council District 4: Steven F. Montano, Isaac E. Chavez and Nathan P. Small. Incumbent Steven Trowbridge is not running for re-election.

• Presiding Municipal Court judge: Melissa Miller-Byrnes, incumbent, and Conrad F. Perea

At approximately 5:01 p.m. today, the candidates will draw for ballot position in the City Clerk’s office.

Share








Advertisements

8 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.

  1. If you leave the land in the County you will get sprawl growth with little to no infrastructure. Septic tanks and single wides on dirt roads, anyone? What “public input” do you want on growth, just the ability to say “no” if you don’t personally like it? Most land use public input meetings are very poorly attended–where was everybody who wanted their say about growth? And Ken, bless his heart, doesn’t have the attention span to run an entire city council meeting. Be careful what you wish for.

  2. “To the previous commentator it is not anti-growth, it is rational and sustainable growth with public input.”

    The low turnout still indicates apathy on the part of the public as it relates to the growth.

  3. Gil Jones’ record of service to his constituents is indeed terrible but to his distantly-related brother-in-law, Philip Philippou, it is exquisite!

  4. What citizens of Las Cruces should be concerned about is not just sprawl growth but the control the big developer has over City hall and its staff. Watching the city staff jump in and bail him out of a pickle last Tuesday nite when the P&Z for one shining moment actually had the audacity to deny his unplatted replat was all anyone needed to see how incestuous he and his staff’s relationships are with the City staff.

  5. To the previous commentator it is not anti-growth, it is rational and sustainable growth with public input. Our present mayor is for sprawl growth controlled by big developers.

  6. Judging by the turn-out at the last P&Z meeting, I’m assuming most people dont’ really care about this anti-growth platform.

  7. I hope Jon runs against Gil Jones, whose record of service to his community is terrible!

Leave a response

You must be logged in to post a comment.