Growth could be key issue in city’s November election
It’s likely that the current controversy over growth and development in
The recent and narrow approval of the spaceport tax and the current dispute over a 6,000-acre development on the city’s
Mayor Bill Mattiace has announced that he will seek re-election. Three council seats – those held by Jose Frietze, Dolores Connor and Steve Trowbridge – are also up for grabs. Trowbridge has announced that he won’t seek re-election.
One of the biggest questions is whether Councilor Ken Miyagishima, who ran unsuccessfully against Mattiace in 2003, will try again this year. On recent issues, including the spaceport tax and
“I get the feeling that they’re drawing lines on this,” Councilor Gil Jones said. “You can feel the tension.”
Philip Philippou, the developer of The Vistas at Presidio, has accused Miyagishima and others who are calling for a possible delay of a vote on the project of trying to stall or torpedo it. In a letter sent to the city Thursday, Joel Newton, attorney for Philippou, accused Miyagishima of “political attempts to engineer a delay.”
“We recognize that Councilor Miyagishima has tied his political ambitions to the ‘no growth’ movement, and so he has systematically set out to oppose each and all of Mr. Philippou’s projects,” the letter states.
It was Miyagishima who sought an opinion from the attorney general on whether the council has to vote today on the annexation of 4,200 acres included in The Vistas at Presidio – a legal opinion which says the council can’t legally vote until next month.
In addition to wanting a delay on that project to allow more public input, Miyagishima opposed the spaceport tax, saying he believed the state should pay the entire cost of the facility.
But Miyagishima said he isn’t anti-growth and is undecided on whether he’ll run against Mattiace later this year. He said his recent stances aren’t political. He likes what he has seen of The Vistas at Presidio project, but believes there hasn’t been enough opportunity for public input.
“I just want to shed some light on this annexation,” Miyagishima said. “I’m here for the public.”
There’s no doubt that the stand he’s taking is earning Miyagishima many supporters. Steve Fischmann, leader of the Quality Growth Alliance, which has pushed for a delay on The Vistas at Presidio, wrote in an e-mail to supporters earlier this month that city officials had better “allow extensive public input” on the project or “their political future is in danger.”
Mattiace sets tone in address
The growth of the commercial space industry, if Spaceport America is successful, promises to accelerate that growth. The Vistas at Presidio, the largest of a number of projects in the works, could, by itself, double the city’s population in 20 years.
Mattiace set the tone for a continuation of that growth in his State of the City address at the beginning of the year.
“We can’t build walls high enough to keep people from this beautiful area and, even if we could, our city is young and people like to make more people,” he said. “So we must find a way to both manage and come to terms with our growth.”
There are, of course, those who don’t want any growth, and many of those involved with Fischmann’s group have opposed development and fought for open-space preservation in the past.
But most Las Crucens acknowledge that the city is going to continue to grow, and that the battles to be fought are over ensuring developments are well-planned and that the city has the resources to keep up with growth.
Mattiace acknowledged the difficulty of that in his address.
“There are signs that, in our efforts to attract new citizens, we have not been as diligent as we could be in responding to our existing citizens,” he said. “Whether it is infrastructure, investment or social services, it’s time to take stock of our older neighborhoods, our senior communities, and our impoverished children.”
Keeping up with growth
One of the most obvious signs of the city’s struggle to keep up with growth is
Meanwhile, the paved road is already bearing the wear of sun, wind and time.
The city and county have begun a process of developing a regional master plan that should be in place by 2009 that will help them more adequately respond to growth. They plan to pay a contractor to develop it and are relying on
A number of public officials are coming to realize that they can’t wait for the master plan. State Rep. Jeff Steinborn, D-Las Cruces and a conservationist who works on a number of open-space initiatives, is proposing a committee made up of city councilors, county commissioners and local lawmakers. He wants it to gather public input and review local-government development policies.
“This is getting out of hand,” he said. “It’s time we hand our growth and development policies back to the citizens and away from the developers.”
Doña Ana County Commissioner Bill McCamley, one of the most pro-growth public officials in the county, is already working on a new policy he will propose to the commission and the Extraterritorial Zoning Authority, the joint city-county board that oversees development in the five miles around
McCamley’s new policy would require two or three public meetings on any development request over 100 acres to address specific topics including schools, infrastructure, water, drainage and affordable housing.
“There isn’t currently a formalized process for public input on specific questions people may have about a particular development,” McCamley said. “If we formalize the process, no one is surprised and, that way, it’s fair.”
That’s been the biggest complaint of those pushing for a delay on The Vistas at Presidio: Though all legal noticing requirements were followed, there wasn’t an intentional effort by the developers to gather public input and incorporate it into a project that has the potential to change the city.
McCamley and Steinborn both said it’s time that changes.
“Things are happening so quickly,” McCamley said. “The demand for growth in the city and county is so large that we’re all having trouble keeping up.”
That trouble, if it’s not kept in check in the next few months, could become the focus of a potential Miyagishima campaign against Mattiace. Though Miyagishima said he’s currently too busy dealing with the immediate development project to think about running for mayor, he also noted that leading the City of
“I can’t deny that I have thought about it,” he said. “That’s always been an ambition of mine.”
|
Share
Tweet
|
Advertisements
|
6 comments so far. Scroll down to submit your own comment.
Leave a response
You must be logged in to post a comment.





Contact


Subscribe









Dump Fees
Proposed Ordinance 184-99 will have a hearing 5/22/2007 9 AM.
Please contact your Commissioner and voice your protest that they bring this fee structure up again.
This ordinance will affect the unincorporated areas that have no choice but to take their trash to the dump.
The proposed fee schedule is:
Short bed/small truck $6.00
Long bed/full size truck $12.00
Full size truck w/side board or small trailer $18.00
Trailer $24.00
Fees include GROSS RECEIPTS TAX.
Start a petition, talk to your neighbors, be at the meeting.
Stop the overtaxing of Dona Ana County residents.
Excellent post, Heath. What I have seen, as an average citizen, is business as ususal on the part of the developer and the city governmental entities: business interests trump citizen interests every time.
Philippou talks about there having been more than enough opportunity for public input, but the truth is most of those opportunities were long before most of us ever became aware of this development. Then he got all hot under the collar, threatening to sue if the vote to annex didn’t go through on Monday, even if the AG said it was illegal–which raised big red flags with me. What’s the problem with an extra 30 or 60 days if it means that the citizens are on board? My guess is he knows that it will give us time to make some important changes to his “Master Plan”.
We already have many, serious traffic, water and infrastructure problems in the city that were completely ignored at the time of their creation in favor of “growth”. Now these same folks want to dump 25-30,000 homes onto the East Mesa, which has only one major road accessing it now, and is already experiencing traffic problems. Will someone tell me what qualifies Philippou to be creator of a new city at the edge of town? Because that is exactly what that many homes is: an entire city. Do we really want ONE person deciding the entire fate for our community?
Then there is the stinky smell of insider deals in regards to the Land Comissioner getting campaign donations from the developer in return for his right to rent the land, and the close relationships he has with those approving the decision to annex in the first place. Then his attorney (who, quite frankly seems FAR too aggressive in all this) criticizes Miyagishima for siding with the “No Growth” folks, which is a cheap political smear. He listens to his constituents, dude–not just the money shakers. So far, no one is giving me the warm fuzzy feeling I should have as a citizen with confidence in my elected representatives.
I am on the side of Steinborn, Miyagishima and even McCamley. These folks DO have our interests at heart, and are not anti-growth. I would rather the citizens of Las Cruces be allowed to come in on this and have some control of the process at this point, even if it takes six more months to do it right. We are not against growth, just stupidly planned and poorly implemented growth, the bad results of which get thrown back on the laps of the taxpayers in the future.
… you better do the right thing, or lose.
So, now that we’ve heard from the Miyagishima campaign …
Heath-
How about next week poll will be on who your readers would want to be the next mayor for the city of Las Cruces?
The average citizen naturally believes in the sustainable and rational growth of Las Cruces. However, all the citizens have to participate in this growth process. In a democracy government shouldn’t favor one economic group like the present mayor and some City Council members. We have to weigh all factors, and everyone has to realize the consequences of their actions. We need to involve the citizenry and not keep them in the dark creating mistrust and suspicion. Maybe the naysayers will be reduced by a new openness in government.
Why are citizens concerned about the new development? It is because there has been no citizen participation. Mr. Philoppou and his staff constantly tout that they adhere to Smart Growth principles in planning their 30,000 housing development. The developer, I assume, is a member of Smart Growth Network (SGN). The Network was formed in response to increasing community concerns about the need for new ways to grow that boost the economy, protect the environment, and enhance community vitality. One of the most important basic Smart Growth principles is that planned development requires “strong citizen involvement”. Smart Growth states that master plans for development without community participation “will be used to create unhealthy, undesirable communities. When people feel left out of important decisions, they will be less likely to become engaged when tough decisions need to be made. Involving the community early and often in the planning process vastly improves public support for smart growth and often leads to innovative strategies that fit the unique needs of each community”.
The developer has not practiced one of the most essential principles of Smart Growth. There has been no public involvement regarding concerns about schools, open spaces, parks, water, traffic patterns, etc. but many City Council members and the present mayor think that is OK. We need to replace the present mayor and all the City Council up for election in November. We need new leaders who will foster public trust and citizen participation and show fiscal responsibility and restraint. The only Council member to exhibit these aspects is Ken Miyagishima.